CEHRT

HHS Announces Crackdown on “Information Blocking” Violations

WyattLLP Electronic Health Records, Health Information Technology , , , , , , ,

By: Kathie McDonald-McClure

The 21st Century Cures Act of 2016 (Cures Act) was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Obama on December 13, 2016. The Cures Act seeks to ensure access, exchange, and use of electronic health information. The Act mandated the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to establish rules prohibiting “information blocking” by developers of certified electronic health information technology (CEHRT), healthcare providers, health information networks (HINs), and health information exchanges (HIEs).

HHS, during the first Trump Administration, proposed and finalized initial information blocking rules for CEHRT developers and healthcare providers. The rules were initially set to take effect in November 2020 but were delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Biden Administration HHS announced that there would be no further delays and those initial information blocking rules became effective on April 21, 2021. These rules are applicable to developers of CEHRT and healthcare providers as well as HINs and HIEs. See 45 C.F.R. Part 171—Information Blocking and see our April 6, 2021 article discussing these complex rules, “Information Blocking Rule Effective April 5, 2021: Are Providers Ready?”

The next mandate under the Cures Act was to establish civil monetary penalties (CMPs) for CEHRT developers and “appropriate disincentives” for healthcare providers who violate the information blocking rules. The Biden Administration HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) proposed and finalized the CMPs of not more than one million dollars per violation for CEHRT developers who commit information blocking. Those rules became effective September 1, 2023. See 42 C.F.R. Part 1003 Subpart N.

The Biden Administration HHS also proposed and finalized the disincentives for certain healthcare providers who run afoul of the information blocking rule. These disincentives became effective on July 31, 2024. See 45 C.F.R. 171.1000.

On September 3, 2025, HHS, under the direction of Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., announced a crackdown on information blocking violations. The announcement states that the Cures Act was “published” during the first Trump Administration despite being signed into law by President Obama. The announcement goes on to say that “[i]nformation blocking was not a priority under the Biden Administration” despite the implementation of penalties and disincentives for violations.

Nevertheless, it is important to note the intent of HHS under Secretary Kennedy to prioritize enforcement of the information blocking rules. The announcement summarizes the penalties and disincentives for information blocking violations. The disincentives for hospitals, critical access hospitals, and clinicians are not as straightforward as the CMPs for CEHRT developers because they are tied to Medicare payment formulas. Although not detailed in the HHS announcement, we discuss the disincentives in more depth in our July 3, 2024 article, “HHS Adds New Teeth to Information Blocking Law for Health Care Providers.”

Looking for assistance in navigating compliance and avoiding the pitfalls associated with the information blocking rules?  We work with our clients regarding their policies and procedures related to compliance with information blocking, HIPAA and other data privacy and security laws and regulations. If you are looking for assistance in this area, contact Kathie McDonald-McClure at (502) 562-7526 or Margaret Levi Young at (859) 288-7469. To learn more about Wyatt’s health care, data privacy and cyber security practice, visit the following Wyatt website pages: Wyatt Data Privacy & Cyber Security and Wyatt Health Care.

Stages 1, 2, And Now 3, Meaningful Use Criteria

Margaret Young Levi Electronic Health Records, Health Information Technology, HITECH Law, Meaningful Use , , , , , , , ,

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) proposed Meaningful Use criteria to implement Stage 3 and allow eligible professionals, eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals (“CAHs”) to qualify for incentive payments (or avoid downward payment adjustments) under the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program implemented by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (“HITECH”) Act of 2009. stethoscope, keyboardThen CMS made changes to Stage 1 and Stage 2 Meaningful Use criteria to better align with the proposed Stage 3 criteria just two weeks later.

On March 30, 2015, CMS published a long-awaited proposed rule which, if finalized, would implement Stage 3, making changes to the objectives and measures of meaningful use for providers effective in Continue reading →

CMS Issues EHR Meaningful Use Hardship Exceptions for Health Care Providers Subject to 2015 Medicare Reimbursement Reduction (Includes Automatic One-Year Reprieve for 2013 Meaningful Users)

Margaret Young Levi EHR Certification Standards, Electronic Health Records, Eligible Professional Incentives, Health Information Technology, HITECH Law, Hospital EHR Incentives, Hospital EHR Stimulus, Meaningful Use, Physician EMR Stimulus , , , ,

EHR Meaningful Use Hardship ExemptionOn February 28, 2014, we posted an article about ICD-10 and Stage 2 Meaningful Use (MU) announcements by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) at the 2014 HIMSS annual conference.  At that conference, while CMS refused to extend the deadlines for ICD-10 and Stage 2 MU, it promised to be more flexible about providing hardship exemptions on Stage 2 MU for providers and vendors truly struggling to meet the incentive program’s requirements.  CMS said that guidance would be forthcoming.  Yesterday, March 10, 2014, CMS issued such guidance.  The Guidance is directed solely at providers experiencing EHR vendor issues.  Importantly, the Guidance gives an automatic, one-year reprieve for certain providers who demonstrated MU for 2013. Continue reading →